Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 42(9): 796-803, Sept. 2009. ilus, tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-524317

ABSTRACT

Genes encoding lipoproteins LipL32, LipL41 and the outer-membrane protein OmpL1 of leptospira were recombined and cloned into a pVAX1 plasmid. BALB/c mice were immunized with LipL32 and recombined LipL32-41-OmpL1 using DNA-DNA, DNA-protein and protein-protein strategies, respectively. Prime immunization was on day 1, boost immunizations were on day 11 and day 21. Sera were collected from each mouse on day 35 for antibody, cytokine detection and microscopic agglutination test while spleen cells were collected for splenocyte proliferation assay. All experimental groups (N = 10 mice per group) showed statistically significant increases in antigen-specific antibodies, in cytokines IL-4 and IL-10, as well as in the microscopic agglutination test and splenocyte proliferation compared with the pVAX1 control group. The groups receiving the recombined LipL32-41-OmpL1 vaccine induced anti-LipL41 and anti-OmpL1 antibodies and yielded better splenocyte proliferation values than the groups receiving LipL32. DNA prime and protein boost immune strategies stimulated more antibodies than a DNA-DNA immune strategy and yielded greater cytokine and splenocyte proliferation than a protein-protein immune strategy. It is clear from these results that recombination of protective antigen genes lipL32, lipL41, and ompL1 and a DNA-protein immune strategy resulted in better immune responses against leptospira than single-component, LipL32, or single DNA or protein immunization.


Subject(s)
Animals , Mice , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Cytokines/immunology , Leptospira/immunology , Vaccines, DNA/immunology , Agglutination Tests , Cytokines/drug effects , Gene Fusion/immunology , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , Leptospira/drug effects , Leptospirosis/immunology , Leptospirosis/prevention & control , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Polymerase Chain Reaction
3.
Journal of Veterinary Science ; : 355-359, 2006.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-197255

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted with 6 different spirochetal strains (4 strains of Leptospira spp. and 2 strains of Borrelia burgdorferi) against 3 antimicrobial agents, commonly used in equine and bovine practice. The ranges of MIC and MBC of amoxicillin against Leptospira spp. were 0.05 - 6.25 microgram/ml and 6.25 - 25.0 microgram/ml, respectively. And the ranges of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of amoxicillin against B. burgdorferi were 0.05 - 0.39 microgram/ml and 0.20 - 0.78 microgram/ml, respectively. The ranges of MIC and MBC of enrofloxacin against Leptospira spp. were 0.05 - 0.39 microgram/ml and 0.05 - 0.39 microgram/ml, respectively. Two strains of B. burgdorferi were resistant to enrofloxacin at the highest concentration tested for MBC (> or = 100 microgram/ml). Therefore, the potential role of tilmicosin in the treatment of leptospirosis and borreliosis should be further evaluated in animal models to understand whether the in vivo studies will confirm in vitro results. All spirochetal isolates were inhibited (MIC) and were killed (MBC) by tilmicosin at concentrations below the limit of testing (< or = 0.01 microgram/ml).


Subject(s)
Amoxicillin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Borrelia burgdorferi/drug effects , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Leptospira/drug effects , Leptospirosis/microbiology , Lyme Disease/microbiology , Macrolides/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL